That's the plan. There's no thing like "everyone knows that," in science. 65% of our users are new users, from these 35% are between 18 and 24 years old. If we claim something, we need to cite it. And we need to make it accessible to our most significant user segments. Finally, this is a science project and not a blog. We are actively removing unverifiable claims and require citations for these which have not been cited. There's only so much we can do with our time.
There's a difference between original claims and speculation. There's no place for speculation here and I'm actively removing all of it. Speculation must always be cited. Especially when claiming that 5ht-2b agonism would induce cardiotoxicity. Additionally, I cannot allow any cardio- and cerebrovascular to stand uncited.
Thanks for submitting your trip report! :) I have changed the title and moved it here: