Talk:Routes of administration
I don't know the name for this route (or if it's already been covered) but some years ago there was a trend in my area (Seattle) of cutting open a small flap of skin and sticking a pill into the wound before shutting it. Would someone want to research it and add it on? (I can totally do it as well)
--Rouge
Hey there, we don't want to advocate this ROA and can't find any formal literature on the topic. All I can find is a Drugs-forum post discussing it, but feel free to do research yourself and let me know if you find anything.
Thanks for the interesting comment. :)
--Oskykins (talk) 15:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Rewording the rectal administration summary
So both examples in the rectal admin section are problematic.
Methamphetamine HCl is NOT a caustic substance (I spend too much time at certain fora trying to explain to tweakers that it is not battery acid) and is perfectly fine for rectal use; in fact it's a great substitute for IV administration.
No reference is given for why phenibut would "burn" your rectum, chemically it's no different from phenylalanine really, and I haven't found any evidence of problems with that ROA.
If I wasn't so shy, I'd delete them myself, but it does leave a problem of substituting good examples.
- Methamphetamine HCl not being 'battery acid' is not fair evidence for a lack of causticity; however, if you have evidence in support of this claim then sharing it would be greatly appreciated. In regard to your phenibut statement, there is a difference between phenibut and phenylalanine 'chemically', they are different chemicals.--BronzeManul (talk) 11:17, 16 July 2017 (CEST)